
2026-10-03
Yet another myth regarding Stalin and Beria needs to be
dispelled:
"Stalin and Beria wanted to reclaim Georgian
lands."
Indeed, Beria was actively grooming future district
committee secretaries for Turkey, as well as a future president of the country.
The objective was the Sovietization—the "reddening"—of Turkey.
Certainly—such a plan did indeed exist.
However, this was by no means an act of concern for Georgia.
Stalin and Beria’s goal was the geopolitical strengthening
of the empire.
A Sovietized Turkey, fully subservient to Moscow, would have
meant the Soviet Union gaining total dominance over the Black Sea.
The Black Sea is a super-strategic geopolitical space
within the Eurasian continent.
When the Ottoman Empire seized control of the Black Sea, the
Silk Road order came to an end. That was precisely when our country’s
fragmentation and troubles began.
From that time on, Georgia found itself outside the
geopolitical order—relegated to a geopolitical "back alley"—a state
of affairs that ultimately led to our enslavement by the empire. Stalin and the
"Red Empire" aimed to dominate the Black Sea, not to "shed
tears" over Georgia.
In other words, Moscow intended to completely block the
trade routes stretching from Europe to Asia, thereby dictating its political
will to Europe.
This meant that we—and other nations—would have lost any
chance of ever breaking free from that bloodthirsty empire.
Furthermore, it would have spelled the total collapse of
Western democracies.
That is why the West, led by the democrat Truman, fiercely
resisted this plan.
The detonation of the American atomic bomb over Hiroshima
was an attempt to curb the geopolitical ambitions of the Soviet Union and
Stalin.
Subsequently, Turkey became a NATO member, and the
Stalin-Beria plan ultimately failed.
Control over the Black Sea was divided between the Soviet
Union and the West on a parity basis, ushering in a post-war peace.
This was known as the "peaceful coexistence of the two
systems." Today, Moscow is waging war against Ukraine precisely because of
Ukrainian Crimea and the Black Sea coast—in a bid to somehow maintain its
geopolitical positions in the Black Sea region.
However, the global and continental geopolitical orders have
already changed.
What Moscow was geopolitically capable of achieving a
century ago is completely out of the question today.
Democratic Europe will no longer cede the Black Sea, while
the Eastern Partnership signifies the full liberation of Eastern Europe and the
restoration of the Silk Road.
A unified Georgia poses a serious and paramount geopolitical threat to the Moscow empire. Moreover, Georgia acts as the geopolitical "gravedigger" of the Moscow empire. Georgia serves as a counter-alternative to Moscow for connecting Europe and Asia. Within the order of the New Silk Road, the "body" of the Georgian state will be fully restored.
Teimuraz Zakradze
Institute for Harmonious Globalization and Governance