Multipolar world and grand countries

Do you know grand countries in football and rugby? Accordingly, in a multipolar, multipolar world there will be many regional leaders, "grand", or "pole" states.

Not "senior" and conquering countries, but competitive leading countries, exemplary countries that will contribute to the progress and development of regions.

The geopolitical order of a multipolar, multipolar world is the result of the policy of liberal globalization and was proclaimed by American Democrats, in particular Barack Obama.

Multipolar liberal globalization means a peaceful life in the world, development and creates a guarantee of the independence of nations.

When and how will nations become independent? When the powers of autocrats are overthrown. This will happen when economies are independent of the state. That is, when they have market economies, a free market. It is called de-oligarchization.

The European Union is a free market zone and a model of a multipolar world. So the concept of a "pole" in state-liberal globalization is fundamentally different from what it was in a bipolar or unipolar world. The bipolar world was a dictate of two poles and the subjugation of nations or even slavery by autocratic regimes. The Soviet pole was a "pharaoh" slave owner with many enslaved nations.

Any nation will become competitive when it has a free market economy. The Baltic and post-Soviet Eastern European countries with free markets and democracy are in the European Union zone.

In other words, the foundation of a multipolar world is free market economies independent of states, a free market - independent banks and independent exchanges.

Exchanges are free trade areas. We don't have stock exchanges, that's why there is oligarchic autocracy.

Multipolarity means expanding the free market; the life of countries with single, honest, competitive rules of the free market. Just like in football, single rules for everyone and the rest depends on talent and hard work.

For example, the natural geopolitical regional leader of South America, don't be surprised, is Cuba. Cuba's internal system affects all of South America and Mexico. When Cuba truly becomes a free market country, then it will become democratic itself, will have a national government and will then help all of South America and Mexico.

The democratic USA, despite being Mexico's immediate neighbor, still cannot influence Mexico's internal system, America has no regional geopolitical influence on Mexico. Cuba is the leader of the region, and while Cuba itself is ruled by a blatant autocracy, other countries in the region also have autocratic systems. So Venezuela will be helped when Cuba becomes a free-market democratic country.

The natural leader of the Caucasus region is Georgia. And much more. The New Silk Road order makes Georgia a pole, a grand state.

So anti-globalist and anti-liberal Georgians are complete absurdities, because we are the nation that gave birth to the philosophy of liberalism and globalization. Shota Rustaveli and Vazha-Pshavela are titans of the philosophy of liberal globalization, we Georgians.

Moreover, Georgia is also a pioneer of the free market. David the Builder's Georgia was a country of free market, freedom of trade, and the entire Caucasus region was a free trade zone, like the European Union.

Autocratic regimes are united in their fight against multipolar globalization. They are fighting against the restoration of the Silk Road, against liberals, against the very concept of liberalism.

In the global hybrid information war, against the new order, the leaders of autocratic regimes are the criminal Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, the puppet Israeli Trump and the citadel of the oligarchic black market, the occupying Moscow empire, which is fully owned by the Jewish Zionist oligarchs who are citizens of Russia and Israel. Don't be surprised by this either and look at the names of the Moscow oligarchs.

Right-wing ideology is a tool of autocrats and when you believe right-wing propaganda lies against globalization, Europe and liberals, i.e. you are hostile to the freedom of your own homeland and in the end it turns out that you do not want your homeland to become a free "grand" country.

Don't believe a word of those who talk a lot about democracy, but say nothing about the freedom of the market, about the independence of the economy from the state. Don't believe anyone who calls an oligarchic economy a free market.

Democracy does not exist without a free market. Democracy, justice, protected rights and freedom exist when citizens are rich or very rich, which is possible only in fair competition in a free market.

Teimuraz Zakradze, Founder of the Institute for Harmonious Globalization and Governance